Re: AlterSubscription_refresh "wrconn" wrong variable?
От | Bharath Rupireddy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: AlterSubscription_refresh "wrconn" wrong variable? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALj2ACVVPp1pTD5_j2Gw_uLFJR9aLSrj=PidHSttM0HhrOFj=Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: AlterSubscription_refresh "wrconn" wrong variable? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: AlterSubscription_refresh "wrconn" wrong variable?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 8:05 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Peter Smith <smithpb2250@gmail.com> writes: > > This patch replaces the global "wrconn" in AlterSubscription_refresh with a local variable of the same name, making itconsistent with other functions in subscriptioncmds.c (e.g. DropSubscription). > > The global wrconn is only meant to be used for logical apply/tablesync worker. > > Using the global/incorrect wrconn in AlterSubscription_refresh doesn't normally cause any problems, but harm is stillposslble if the apply worker ever manages to do a subscription refresh. e.g. see [1] > > Hm. I would actually place the blame for this on whoever thought > it was okay to name a global variable something as generic as > "wrconn". Let's rename that while we're at it, say to something > like "tablesync_wrconn" (feel free to bikeshed). I don't think "tablesync_wrconn" is the right name, because wrconn is also being used in logical replication apply worker. So something like "apply_worker_wrconn" would be more meaningful. With Regards, Bharath Rupireddy. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: