Re: pg_relation_size on partitioned table
От | Bharath Rupireddy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_relation_size on partitioned table |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALj2ACVJwqwTeOGVr+pyLt3+=Rcn6uHAkBy=BoRQm5J4=ZJ=fw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_relation_size on partitioned table (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_relation_size on partitioned table
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 11:35 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 08:52:40PM +0800, Japin Li wrote: > > Could we provide a function to get the total size of the partition table > > though the partitioned table name? Maybe we can extend > > the pg_relation_size() to get the total size of partition tables through > > the partitioned table name. > > There are already many replies on this thread, but nobody has > mentioned pg_partition_tree() yet, so here you go. You could use that > in combination with pg_relation_size() to get the whole size of a tree > depending on your needs. Yeah. The docs have a note on using it for finding partitioned table size: <para> For example, to check the total size of the data contained in a partitioned table <structname>measurement</structname>, one could use the following query: <programlisting> SELECT pg_size_pretty(sum(pg_relation_size(relid))) AS total_size FROM pg_partition_tree('measurement'); </programlisting> </para> Regards, Bharath Rupireddy.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: