Re: Logical Replication - detail message with names of missing columns
От | Bharath Rupireddy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Logical Replication - detail message with names of missing columns |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALj2ACVFkf_V+5Mv+jajZKJJNcTMfGY5gPrXc61VPKhPYFLbTA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Logical Replication - detail message with names of missing columns (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Logical Replication - detail message with names of missing columns
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 6:50 AM Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 for objective. However, that can be done simpler way that doesn't > need additional loops by using bitmapset to hold missing remote > attribute numbers. This also make the variable "found" useless. > Thanks. I will look into it and post a v2 patch soon. > > > Here's a snapshot how the error looks with the patch: > > 2020-09-04 01:00:36.721 PDT [843128] ERROR: logical replication > > target relation "public.test_1" is missing "b1, d1" replicated columns > > 2020-09-04 01:00:46.784 PDT [843132] ERROR: logical replication > > target relation "public.test_1" is missing "b1" replicated columns > > 2020-09-06 21:24:53.645 PDT [902945] ERROR: logical replication > > target relation "public.test_1" is missing "a1, c1, d1, b1" replicated > > columns > > > > Thoughts? > > FWIW, I would prefer that the message be like > > logical replication target relation "public.test_1" is missing > replicated columns: "a1", "c1" > This looks fine, I will change that. > > I'm not sure we need to have separate messages for singular and plural. > I don't think we need to have separate messages. To keep it simple, let's have plural form. With Regards, Bharath Rupireddy. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: