Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes
От | Bharath Rupireddy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALj2ACVEifS_rmKtsW_O67YrKEegxZJGVF-5Cb3qe3mxhc=UOA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 10:45 AM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 11:07 AM Bharath Rupireddy > <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 12:00 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thanks for the comments, attached v17 patch has the fix for the same. > > > > Have a minor comment on v17: > > > > can we modify the elog(LOG, to new style ereport(LOG, ? > > + elog(LOG_SERVER_ONLY, "current backtrace:%s", errtrace.data); > > > > /*---------- > > * New-style error reporting API: to be used in this way: > > * ereport(ERROR, > > * errcode(ERRCODE_UNDEFINED_CURSOR), > > * errmsg("portal \"%s\" not found", stmt->portalname), > > * ... other errxxx() fields as needed ...); > > * > > Attached v18 patch has the changes for the same. Thanks. The v18 patch LGTM. I'm not sure if the CF bot failure is related to the patch - https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5633364051886080 Regards, Bharath Rupireddy.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: