Re: Patch proposal: New hooks in the connection path
От | Bharath Rupireddy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch proposal: New hooks in the connection path |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALj2ACV=myRhO6C3X6BB6qK-FCX1BfDNuaBm0NYMD38oc0hiSg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch proposal: New hooks in the connection path ("Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot@amazon.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch proposal: New hooks in the connection path
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 6:29 PM Drouvot, Bertrand <bdrouvot@amazon.com> wrote: > > On 7/2/22 2:49 AM, Roberto Mello wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2022 at 5:00 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> That being said, I don't see why this information couldn't be provided in a >> system view. IMO it is generically useful. > > +1 for a system view with appropriate permissions, in addition to the hooks. > > That would make the information easily accessible to a number or monitoring systems besides the admin. > > Agree about that. Are we going to have it as a part of shared memory stats? Or a separate shared memory for connection stats exposing these via a function and a view can be built on this function like pg_get_replication_slots and pg_replication_slots? > I'll start another thread and propose a dedicated patch for the "internal counters" and how to expose them. IMHO, let's have the discussion here in this thread and the patch can be 0002. Regards, Bharath Rupireddy.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: