Re: Switching XLog source from archive to streaming when primary available
От | Bharath Rupireddy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Switching XLog source from archive to streaming when primary available |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALj2ACUkABNTs5kiXSM-2qW_NBpP6gC-T76=Mwy-GqQd7UE3uw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Switching XLog source from archive to streaming when primary available (Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Switching XLog source from archive to streaming when primary available
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 16, 2022 at 12:06 PM Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com> wrote: > > In other words, it seems to me that the macro name doesn't manifest > the condition correctly. > > I don't think we don't particularly want to do that unconditionally. > I wanted just to get rid of the macro from the usage site. Even if > the same condition is used elsewhere, I see it better to write out the > condition directly there.. I wanted to avoid a bit of duplicate code there. How about naming that macro IsXLOGSourceSwitchToStreamEnabled() or SwitchFromArchiveToStreamEnabled() or just SwitchFromArchiveToStream() or any other better name? -- Bharath Rupireddy PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: