Re: [PATCH] Use RelationClose rather than table_close in heap_create_with_catalog
От | Bharath Rupireddy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] Use RelationClose rather than table_close in heap_create_with_catalog |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALj2ACU_AvhYG=RK_CF7c3vnBOVyoozd8wzwOQ+KBuxrQa8yhQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [PATCH] Use RelationClose rather than table_close in heap_create_with_catalog (Xiaoran Wang <wxiaoran@vmware.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Use RelationClose rather than table_close in heap_create_with_catalog
Re: [PATCH] Use RelationClose rather than table_close in heap_create_with_catalog |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 12:34 PM Xiaoran Wang <wxiaoran@vmware.com> wrote: > > Hi hackers, > > In heap_create_with_catalog, the Relation new_rel_desc is created > by RelationBuildLocalRelation, not table_open. So it's better to > call RelationClose to release it. > > What's more, the comment for it seems useless, just delete it. Essentially, all the close functions are the same with NoLock, IOW, table_close(relation, NoLock) = relation_closerelation, NoLock) = RelationClose(relation). Therefore, table_close(new_rel_desc, NoLock); looks fine to me. And, the /* do not unlock till end of xact */, it looks like it's been there from day 1. It may be indicating that the ref count fo the new relation created in heap_create_with_catalog() will be decremented at the end of xact, but I'm not sure what it means. -- Bharath Rupireddy PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: