Re: Suppressing useless wakeups in walreceiver

On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 2:38 AM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2022 at 09:45:40PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 9:20 PM Bharath Rupireddy
> > <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Thanks. Do we need a similar wakeup approach for logical replication
> >> workers in worker.c? Or is it okay that the nap time is 1sec there?
> >
> > Yeah, I think so.  At least for its idle/nap case (waiting for flush
> > is also a technically interesting case, but harder, and applies to
> > non-idle systems so the polling is a little less offensive).
>
> Bharath, are you planning to pick this up?  If not, I can probably spend
> some time on it.

Please go ahead!

--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com