Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<>)?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bharath Rupireddy
Тема Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<>)?
Дата
Msg-id CALj2ACUOd9pWbGu2vJKCv8U1rfmPS9W8BqxwJ5KBM8BJWwKX0A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<>)?  ("Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com>)
Ответы Re: Should we improve "PID XXXX is not a PostgreSQL server process" warning for pg_terminate_backend(<>)?
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 4:17 AM Bossart, Nathan <bossartn@amazon.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/18/21, 8:27 PM, "Bharath Rupireddy" <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Here's the v4 patch with the above changes, the output looks like [1].
> > Please review it further.
>
> I agree with Tom.  I would just s/server/backend/ (as per the
> attached) and call it a day.

Thanks. v5 patch looks good to me.

Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: