On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 7:38 PM Kazutaka Onishi <onishi@heterodb.com> wrote:
> > 3) I think we need truncatable behaviour that is consistent with updatable.
>
> It's not correct. "truncatable" option works the same as "updatable".
> I've confirmed that the table can be truncated with the combination:
> truncatable on the server setting is false & truncatable on the table
> setting is true.
> I've also added to the test.
Yeah you are right! I was wrong in understanding.
> > 7) Did you try checking whether we reach hash_destroy code when a
> > failure happens on executing truncate on a remote table? Otherwise we
> > might want to do routine->ExecForeignTruncate inside PG_TRY block?
>
> I've added PG_TRY block.
Did you check that hash_destroy is not reachable when an error occurs
on the remote server while executing truncate command? If yes, then
only we will have PG_TRY block, otherwise not.
> > 9) It will be good if you can divide up your patch into 3 separate
> > patches - 0001 code, 0002 tests, 0003 documentation
>
> I'll do it when I send a patch in the future, please forgive me on this patch.
That's okay.
With Regards,
Bharath Rupireddy.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com