Re: Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c?
От | Ashwin Agrawal |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALfoeitODkrP1rwe=i0Bg++aTdsgOuTECOYQ6ks+Aw+uznW39g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c? (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: Should we rename amapi.h and amapi.c?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Dec 22, 2019 at 9:34 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
Hi all,
I was working on some stuff for table AMs, and I got to wonder it we
had better rename amapi.h to indexam.h and amapi.c to indexam.c, so as
things are more consistent with table AM. It is a bit annoying to
name the files dedicated to index AMs with what looks like now a too
generic name. That would require switching a couple of header files
for existing module developers, which is always annoying, but the move
makes sense thinking long-term?
Any thoughts?
I had raised the same earlier and [1] has response from Andres, which was "We probably should rename it, but not in 12..."
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: