Re: Any reasons to not move pgstattuple to core?
От | Sergey Konoplev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Any reasons to not move pgstattuple to core? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAL_0b1vaTFx4C9JgfVPuSToUrAFzmkDe4JXnrzhY1d9UtY+fVw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Any reasons to not move pgstattuple to core? (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Any reasons to not move pgstattuple to core?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> Well, this is a general problem with any extension - somebody might >> want it on a system on which the admin is unable or unwilling to >> install it. But we can't put every possible extension in core. > > The flip-side is that we could have made an awful lot of built-in > things extensions, but for whatever reason chose not to. I'm not > necessarily in favor of putting pgstattuple in core, but the question > should be asked: Why should we do this here? In what way is > pgstattuple like or not like the other things that are in core? I would highlight it as it became a kind of routine one. Also, sometimes it is required to solve problems, not to make new features, so it often can not wait. -- Kind regards, Sergey Konoplev PostgreSQL Consultant and DBA http://www.linkedin.com/in/grayhemp +1 (415) 867-9984, +7 (901) 903-0499, +7 (988) 888-1979 gray.ru@gmail.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: