Re: Replication/cloning: rsync vs modification dates?
От | Sergey Konoplev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Replication/cloning: rsync vs modification dates? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAL_0b1sAQwOXWPOFuk8VJPqCfLYXGJenWM4QxdciYxW6uSmfFQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Replication/cloning: rsync vs modification dates? (Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Replication/cloning: rsync vs modification dates?
Re: Replication/cloning: rsync vs modification dates? |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Michael Nolan <htfoot@gmail.com> wrote: >> As I understand the docs for rsync, it will use both mod time and file size >> if told not to do checksums. I wonder if it is correct in general to use mtime and size to perform these checks from the point of view of PostgreSQL. If it works with the current version then is there a guaranty that it will work with the future versions? > > Oh, so it does, I misread. Thanks! Time+size it is. > > ChrisA > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general -- Sergey Konoplev a database architect, software developer at PostgreSQL-Consulting.com http://www.postgresql-consulting.com Jabber: gray.ru@gmail.com Skype: gray-hemp Phone: +79160686204
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: