Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs. address/IP-address/IP-maskfields

Hi Bruce,

On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 15:27, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > 1. Near the top, there's a line saying "A record can have one of the seven
> > formats", then the followup list shows 9 formats. The ones on host[no]gssenc
> > were added to the IP-address/IP-mask section, but not to the address
> > section. I believe the intention was to have 11 lines there, with a
> > corresponding count at the top.
...
> I agree with your suggestions.  I also noticed that pg_hba.conf is
> missing gssapi entries too, so I added them to the attached patch. too.

I thought the list would jump to 11 lines there, meaning 1 local plus
5 on address plus 5 on IP-address/IP-mask.
As it stands now with 9 lines, it's 1 local plus 3 on address (it's
missing the two on host[no]gssenc) plus 5 on IP-address/IP-mask.

Tureba - Arthur Nascimento