Re: [PATCH] Automatic HASH and LIST partition creation
| От | Pavel Borisov |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PATCH] Automatic HASH and LIST partition creation |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CALT9ZEF_aMgYoEg9JFYm9GUDwaa014wu7rtS_To8f82zt_rHaw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Automatic HASH and LIST partition creation (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Automatic HASH and LIST partition creation
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> BTW could you tell me a couple of words about pros and cons of c-code
> syntax parsing comparing to parsing using gram.y trees?
I'd rather use an automatic tool (lexer/parser) if possible instead of
doing it by hand if I can. If you want a really nice syntax with clever
tricks, then you may need to switch to manual though, but pg/sql is not in
that class.
> I think both are possible but my predisposition was that we'd better use
> the later if possible.
I agree.
Thank you!
Fabien, do you consider it possible to change the syntax of declarative partitioning too? It is problematic as it is already committed but also is very tempting to have the same type of syntax both in automatic partitioning and in manual (PARTITION OF...)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: