Re: including pid's for `There are XX other sessions using the database`
| От | Zhihong Yu |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: including pid's for `There are XX other sessions using the database` |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CALNJ-vT5RcaEF5JJn3a7pDnuEjcUvb+D+2Y+Q98K1kLePY4LpA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: including pid's for `There are XX other sessions using the database` (Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 6:39 AM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 02:52:29AM -0700, Zhihong Yu wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 9:31 PM Euler Taveira <euler@eulerto.com> wrote:
>
> >
> Thanks for responding.
>
> Since pg_stat_activity shows fewer number of connections compared to the
> number revealed in the error message,
> I am not sure the above query would terminate all connections for the
> database to be dropped.
How exactly are you checking pg_stat_activity? If you query that view right
after a failed attempt at dropping a database, there's no guarantee to find the
exact same connections on the target database as client might connect or
disconnect.
If you prevent any further connection by e.g. tweaking the pg_hba.conf then you
have a guarantee that the query will terminate all conflicting connections.
Using the FORCE option is just a simpler way to do it, as dropdb() starts with
preventing any new connection on the target database.
Overall, I agree that adding the list of pid to the message error message
doesn't seem useful.
Thanks for the comments, Euler and Julien.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: