Re: Rename of triggers for partitioned tables
| От | Zhihong Yu |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Rename of triggers for partitioned tables |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CALNJ-vRE3F1_s9bt_d05RMgLdYwQuig8aUbg2F=bhRtYbfvzOQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Rename of triggers for partitioned tables (Arne Roland <A.Roland@index.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Rename of triggers for partitioned tables
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 10:08 AM Arne Roland <A.Roland@index.de> wrote:
From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2021 18:36
Subject: Re: Rename of triggers for partitioned tables
> I'll have a look during the commitfest which starts late next week.Thank you!
> (However, I'm fairly sure that it won't be in released versions ...
> it'll only be fixed in the version to be released next year, postgres
> 15. Things that are clear bug fixes can be applied
> in released versions, but this patch probably changes behavior in ways
> that are not acceptable in released versions. Sorry about that.)
I never expected any backports. Albeit I don't know anyone, who would mind, I agree with you on that assessment. This is very annoying, but not really breaking the product.Sure, I was hoping for pg14 initially. But I will survive another year of gexec.I am grateful you agreed to have a look!Regards
Arne
Hi, Arne:
It seems the patch no longer applies cleanly on master branch.
Do you mind updating the patch ?
Thanks
patching file src/backend/parser/gram.y
Hunk #1 succeeded at 8886 (offset 35 lines).
patching file src/backend/utils/adt/ri_triggers.c
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
Apply anyway? [n]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file src/backend/utils/adt/ri_triggers.c.rej
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: