Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks
| От | Zhihong Yu |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CALNJ-vQFdWqJw76yfVwUJb2=i1mQ7GnAPzG+L2TuoN7t1gnXWQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 10:20 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 2:00 PM Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry for the delay. This patch no longer applies, it has some conflict with d6f96ed94e73052f99a2e545ed17a8b2fdc1fb8a
Thanks Corey for the heads up. Rebased with some cosmetic adjustments.
Hi,
+ Assert(partidx < 0 || partidx < partdesc->nparts);
+ partoid = partdesc->oids[partidx];
+ partoid = partdesc->oids[partidx];
If partidx < 0, do we still need to fill out partoid and is_leaf ? It seems we can return early based on (should call table_close(rel) first):
+ /* No partition found. */
+ if (partidx < 0)
+ return NULL;
+ if (partidx < 0)
+ return NULL;
Cheers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: