Re: search_plan_tree(): handling of non-leaf CustomScanState nodes causes segfault
От | Zhihong Yu |
---|---|
Тема | Re: search_plan_tree(): handling of non-leaf CustomScanState nodes causes segfault |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALNJ-vQ6M=0aQvdpObOABMX4ZWDJmRX1JEO4_wzR_g2w=zh6qg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | search_plan_tree(): handling of non-leaf CustomScanState nodes causes segfault (David Geier <david@swarm64.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
+ * Custom scan nodes can be leaf nodes or inner nodes and therfore need special treatment.
The special treatment applies to inner nodes. The above should be better phrased to clarify.
Cheers
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 2:43 AM David Geier <david@swarm64.com> wrote:
Hi hackers,
While working with cursors that reference plans with CustomScanStates
nodes, I encountered a segfault which originates from
search_plan_tree(). The query plan is the result of a simple SELECT
statement into which I inject a Custom Scan node at the root to do some
post-processing before returning rows. This plan is referenced by a
second plan with a Tid Scan which originates from a query of the form
DELETE FROM foo WHERE CURRENT OF my_cursor;
search_plan_tree() assumes that
CustomScanState::ScanState::ss_currentRelation is never NULL. In my
understanding that only holds for CustomScanState nodes which are at the
bottom of the plan and actually read from a relation. CustomScanState
nodes which are not at the bottom don't have ss_currentRelation set. I
believe for such nodes, instead search_plan_tree() should recurse into
CustomScanState::custom_ps.
I attached a patch. Any thoughts?
Best regards,
David
Swarm64
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: