Re: Proposal: Generic WAL logical messages

On 1 February 2016 at 09:45, Alexander Korotkov
<a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 29 January 2016 at 21:11, Alexander Korotkov
>> <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
>>>
>>> Should we think more about naming? Does two kinds of generic records
>>> confuse people?
>>
>>
>> Logical messages
>>
>> Generic WAL records
>>
>> Seems like I can tell them apart. Worth checking, but I think we're OK.
>
>
> I was worrying because topic name is "Generic WAL logical messages". But if
> we name them just "Logical messages" then it's OK for me.
>

Yeah the patch talks about logical messages, I use different title in
mailing list and CF to make it more clear on first sight what this
actually is technically.

--  Petr Jelinek                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services