Re: Parallel copy
От | vignesh C |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Parallel copy |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALDaNm3vwmmt6Duao9ADB5Wed9G3JM41ECLsoPtCQXGRqkm=MQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: Parallel copy ("Hou, Zhijie" <houzj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 3:05 PM Hou, Zhijie <houzj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > Hi > > > Yes this optimization can be done, I will handle this in the next patch > > set. > > > > I have a suggestion for the parallel safety-check. > > As designed, The leader does not participate in the insertion of data. > If User use (PARALLEL 1), there is only one worker process which will do the insertion. > > IMO, we can skip some of the safety-check in this case, becase the safety-check is to limit parallel insert. > (except temporary table or ...) > > So, how about checking (PARALLEL 1) separately ? > Although it looks a bit complicated, But (PARALLEL 1) do have a good performance improvement. > Thanks for the comments Hou Zhijie, I will run a few tests with 1 worker and try to include this in the next patch set. Regards, Vignesh EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: