Re: Added schema level support for publication.
От | vignesh C |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Added schema level support for publication. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALDaNm3tQuF4SDMkuSv0xJDRQAhQ5Ow_UT9if3BTE3ocnKQfDA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Added schema level support for publication. (Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Added schema level support for publication.
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 12:12 PM Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 1:28 PM houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com
> <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> > Currently, postgres caches publication actions info in the
> > RelationData::rd_pubactions, but after applying the patch, it seems
> > rd_pubactions is not initialized when using schema level publication.
> >
> > It cound result in some unexpected behaviour when checking if command can be
> > executed with current replica identity.
> >
>
> While testing this patch, I'm finding that for a FOR SCHEMA
> publication, UPDATEs and DELETEs on tables belonging to that schema
> are not getting replicated (but INSERTs and TRUNCATEs are).
> Could this be related to the issues that Hou-san has identified?
Thanks for reporting this issue. I felt this issue is the same as the issue which Hou San had reported. This issue is fixed in the v10 patch attached at [1].
[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm2%2BtR%2B8R-sD1CSyMbZcZbkintZE-avefjsp7LCkm6HMmw%40mail.gmail.com
Regards,
Vignesh
>
> On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 1:28 PM houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com
> <houzj.fnst@fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> > Currently, postgres caches publication actions info in the
> > RelationData::rd_pubactions, but after applying the patch, it seems
> > rd_pubactions is not initialized when using schema level publication.
> >
> > It cound result in some unexpected behaviour when checking if command can be
> > executed with current replica identity.
> >
>
> While testing this patch, I'm finding that for a FOR SCHEMA
> publication, UPDATEs and DELETEs on tables belonging to that schema
> are not getting replicated (but INSERTs and TRUNCATEs are).
> Could this be related to the issues that Hou-san has identified?
Thanks for reporting this issue. I felt this issue is the same as the issue which Hou San had reported. This issue is fixed in the v10 patch attached at [1].
[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm2%2BtR%2B8R-sD1CSyMbZcZbkintZE-avefjsp7LCkm6HMmw%40mail.gmail.com
Regards,
Vignesh
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: