Re: User functions for building SCRAM secrets

On Sat, 2 Dec 2023 at 12:22, John Naylor <johncnaylorls@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 9:06 PM Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote:
> >
> > Maybe I'm not conveying the problem this is solving -- I'm happy to go
> > one more round trying to make it clearer -- but if this is not clear,
> > it'd be good to at develop an alternative approach to this before
> > withdrawing the patch.
>
> This thread had some lively discussion, but it doesn't seem to have
> converged towards consensus, and hasn't had activity since April. That
> being the case, maybe it's time to withdraw and reconsider the
> approach later?

I have changed the status of this commitfest entry to "Returned with
Feedback" as currently nobody pursued the discussion to get a
conclusion. Feel free to discuss more on this and once it reaches a
better shape, add a new entry for this to take it forward.

Regards,
Vignesh