Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication
От | vignesh C |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALDaNm3LDCRbBwbDfYfy8baOGH8FoQ8CWfJQtbT-EpxtX7puEg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 at 11:25, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 6:21 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 03:58:25PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 2:26 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Thanks, the changes look good. > > > > > > Pushed. > > > > Yeah! Thanks Amit and everybody involved here! Thanks also to Julien > > for raising the thread and the problem, to start with. > > > > I think the next possible step here is to document how to upgrade the > logical replication nodes as previously discussed in this thread [1]. > IIRC, there were a few issues with the steps mentioned but if we want > to document those we can start a separate thread for it as that > involves both publishers and subscribers. I have posted a patch for this at: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm1_iDO6srWzntqTr0ZDVkk2whVhNKEWAvtgZBfSmuBeZQ%40mail.gmail.com Regards, Vignesh
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: