On Thu, 12 Jan 2023 at 05:22, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:29:25PM +0530, vignesh C wrote:
> > I too felt keeping it simpler is better. How about using the simple
> > first version of patch itself?
>
> Okay, I have just done that, then, after checking that all the object
> types were covered (28). Note that PROCEDURAL LANGUAGE has been
> removed for simplicity.
Thanks for pushing this.
Regards,
Vignesh