Re: Lockless queue of waiters in LWLock
От | vignesh C |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Lockless queue of waiters in LWLock |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALDaNm2vk_NkwtNdUZNHi9wcfOb9xTBcTCVGdtXCgiPgKgzzGg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Lockless queue of waiters in LWLock (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 20 Jan 2024 at 07:28, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, 26 Nov 2022 at 00:24, Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, hackers! > > In the measurements above in the thread, I've been using LIFO wake > > queue in a primary lockless patch (and it was attached as the previous > > versions of a patch) and an "inverted wake queue" (in faсt FIFO) as > > the alternative benchmarking option. I think using the latter is more > > fair and natural and provided they show no difference in the speed, > > I'd make the main patch using it (attached as v6). No other changes > > from v5, though. > > There has not been much interest on this as the thread has been idle > for more than a year now. I'm not sure if we should take it forward or > not. I would prefer to close this in the current commitfest unless > someone wants to take it further. I have returned this patch in commitfest as nobody had shown any interest in pursuing it. Feel free to add a new entry when someone wants to work on this more actively. Regards, Vignesh
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: