Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
От | vignesh C |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALDaNm2_WY2t2GnzW1-QL823+xk5cuC0zc4Eep8fjYeLB0jfRA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 9:13 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 7:12 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 7:56 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Thank you for updating the patch! > > > > > I have made a number of changes in the attached patch which includes > > > (a) the patch was trying to register multiple array entries for the > > > same subscription which doesn't seem to be required, see changes in > > > pgstat_vacuum_stat, (b) multiple changes in the test like reduced the > > > wal_retrieve_retry_interval to 2s which has reduced the test time to > > > half, remove the check related to resetting of stats as there is no > > > guarantee that the message will be received by the collector and we > > > were not sending it again, changed the test case file name to > > > 026_stats as we can add more subscription-related stats in this test > > > file itself > > > > Since we have pg_stat_subscription view, how about 026_worker_stats.pl? > > > > Sounds better. Updated patch attached. Thanks for the updated patch, the v28 patch looks good to me. Regards, Vignesh
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: