On Sun, 21 Jan 2024 at 07:32, vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2 Aug 2023 at 21:34, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 8/2/23 17:25, Sergey Dudoladov wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > >> Parallel version is not supported, but I think it should be possible.
> > >
> > > @Tomas are you working on this ? If not, I would like to give it a try.
> > >
> >
> > Feel free to try. Just keep it in a separate part/patch, to make it
> > easier to combine the work later.
> >
> > >> static void
> > >> AssertCheckRanges(BrinSortState *node)
> > >> {
> > >> #ifdef USE_ASSERT_CHECKING
> > >>
> > >> #endif
> > >> }
> > >
> > > I guess it should not be empty at the ongoing development stage.
> > >
> > > Attached a small modification of the patch with a draft of the docs.
> > >
> >
> > Thanks. FWIW it's generally better to always post the whole patch
> > series, otherwise the cfbot gets confused as it's unable to combine
> > stuff from different messages.
>
> Are we planning to take this patch forward? It has been nearly 5
> months since the last discussion on this. If the interest has gone
> down and if there are no plans to handle this I'm thinking of
> returning this commitfest entry in this commitfest and can be opened
> when there is more interest.
Since the author or no one else showed interest in taking it forward
and the patch had no activity for more than 5 months, I have changed
the status to RWF. Feel free to add a new CF entry when someone is
planning to resume work more actively by starting off with a rebased
version.
Regards,
Vignesh