Re: Replication slot stats misgivings
От | vignesh C |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Replication slot stats misgivings |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALDaNm1oj=v=6FGgDxUiL2rPVNO7WGzY8gkfKRMyLdEaPpnGqA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Replication slot stats misgivings (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 9:02 AM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 8:43 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 7:36 AM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 3:51 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > > > > > > > I wrote: > > > > > The buildfarm suggests that this isn't entirely stable: > > > > > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=anole&dt=2021-04-17%2011%3A14%3A49 > > > > > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=bichir&dt=2021-04-17%2016%3A30%3A15 > > > > > > > > Oh, I missed that hyrax is showing the identical symptom: > > > > > > > > https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=hyrax&dt=2021-04-16%2007%3A05%3A44 > > > > > > > > So you might try CLOBBER_CACHE_ALWAYS to see if you can reproduce it > > > > that way. > > > > > > > > > > I will try to check and identify why it is failing. > > > > > > > I think the failure is due to the reason that in the new tests after > > reset, we are not waiting for the stats message to be delivered as we > > were doing in other cases. Also, for the new test (non-spilled case), > > we need to decode changes as we are doing for other tests, otherwise, > > it will show the old stats. > > I also felt that is the reason for the failure, I will fix and post a > patch for this. Attached a patch which includes the changes for the fix. I have moved the non-spilled transaction test to reduce the steps which reduces calling pg_logical_slot_get_changes before this test. Regards, Vignesh
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: