Re: Option to dump foreign data in pg_dump
От | vignesh C |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Option to dump foreign data in pg_dump |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALDaNm1YVaQvyDc49TQ+pHf8TBB_k9YDLpSHiPqv3g==GDSQjA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Option to dump foreign data in pg_dump (Luis Carril <luis.carril@swarm64.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Option to dump foreign data in pg_dump
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 2:10 PM Luis Carril <luis.carril@swarm64.com> wrote: > > Luis, > > It seems you've got enough support for this concept, so let's move > forward with this patch. There are some comments from Tom about the > patch; would you like to send an updated version perhaps? > > Thanks > > Hi, > > I've attached a new version (v6) removing the superfluous JOIN that Tom identified, and not collecting the oids (avoidingthe query) if the option is not used at all. > > About the testing issues that Tom mentioned: > I do not see how can we have a pure SQL dummy FDW that tests the functionality. Because the only way to identify if thedata of a foreign table for the chosen server is dumped is if the COPY statement appears in the output, but if the C callbacksof the FDW are not implemented, then the SELECT that dumps the data to generate the COPY cannot be executed. > Also, to test that the include option chooses only the data of the specified foreign servers we would need some negativetesting, i.e. that the COPY statement for the non-desired table does not appear. But I do not find these kind oftests in the test suite, even for other selective options like --table or --exclude-schema. > Can you have a look at dump with parallel option. Parallel option will take a lock on table while invoking lockTableForWorker. May be this is not required for foreign tables. Thoughts? Regards, Vignesh EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: