Re: handle a ECPG_bytea typo
От | vignesh C |
---|---|
Тема | Re: handle a ECPG_bytea typo |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALDaNm1CSqdgOOU_kixrnJL0Rf0K4ZUbMzts1RCimF6S=vcE3A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | handle a ECPG_bytea typo ("Wang, Shenhao" <wangsh.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: handle a ECPG_bytea typo
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 1:35 PM Wang, Shenhao <wangsh.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: > > Hi, hackers > > The source looks like: > > case ECPGt_bytea: > { > struct ECPGgeneric_varchar *variable = > (struct ECPGgeneric_varchar *) (var->value); > > ...... > } > > I think the developer intend to use struct ECPGgeneric_bytea instead of struct ECPGgeneric_varchar > > Is this thoughts right? > > I have wrote a patch to fix this typo I felt the changes look correct. The reason it might be working earlier is because the structure members are the same for both the data structures ECPGgeneric_bytea & ECPGgeneric_varchar. Regards, Vignesh EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: