Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table
От | Surafel Temesgen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALAY4q8ko8kpY-cm84XNNEnBdSqWUr1K5ZRmWLJy8aXG_Thrjw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table (Rémi Lapeyre <remi.lapeyre@lenstra.fr>) |
Ответы |
Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hey Rémi,
Thank you for looking at it
On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 7:05 PM Rémi Lapeyre <remi.lapeyre@lenstra.fr> wrote:
Hi, thanks for working on this. I had planned to work on it and I’m looking forward to this natively in Postgres.
The patch builds with the following warnings:
plancat.c:2368:18: warning: variable 'name' is used uninitialized whenever 'for' loop exits because its condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
for (int i = 0; i < natts; i++)
^~~~~~~~~
plancat.c:2379:9: note: uninitialized use occurs here
return name;
^~~~
plancat.c:2368:18: note: remove the condition if it is always true
for (int i = 0; i < natts; i++)
^~~~~~~~~
plancat.c:2363:15: note: initialize the variable 'name' to silence this warning
char *name;
^
= NULL
plancat.c:2396:18: warning: variable 'name' is used uninitialized whenever 'for' loop exits because its condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
for (int i = 0; i < natts; i++)
^~~~~~~~~
plancat.c:2407:9: note: uninitialized use occurs here
return name;
^~~~
plancat.c:2396:18: note: remove the condition if it is always true
for (int i = 0; i < natts; i++)
^~~~~~~~~
plancat.c:2391:15: note: initialize the variable 'name' to silence this warning
char *name;
^
= NULL
2 warnings generated.
I wonder why my compiler didn't show me this
make check pass without issues, but make check-world fails for postgres_fdw, the diff is attached.
Okay thanks the attached patch contains a fix for both issue
Before going further in the review, I’m a bit surprised by the quantity of code needed here. In https://github.com/xocolatl/periods there is far less code and I would have expected the same here. For example, are the changes to copy necessary or would it be possible to have a first patch the only implement the minimal changes required for this feature?
Yes there not many c code in there because most of the logice is written in SQL
regards
Surafel
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: