Re: [HACKERS] New CORRESPONDING clause design

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Surafel Temesgen
Тема Re: [HACKERS] New CORRESPONDING clause design
Дата
Msg-id CALAY4q-8-S8R4LLYwvGCRcAmmhyYhVa0husooVRTutWe7UDYkA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] New CORRESPONDING clause design  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] New CORRESPONDING clause design  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers


On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:


I am sending minor update - cleaning formatting and white spaces, error messages + few more tests
 
Thank you very much for your help
  

Maybe correspondingClause needs own node type with attached location. Then context can be much better positioned.
 

I think we can solve it by using your option or using expr_list for corresponding column and check the syntax manually.

In my opinion, the last option eliminate the introduction of new node for only the sake of error position.


What did you think about the second option?


Regards 

Surafel



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes
Следующее
От: Mithun Cy
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.