Re: [HACKERS] INSERT .. ON CONFLICT DO SELECT [FOR ..]
| От | Marko Tiikkaja |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] INSERT .. ON CONFLICT DO SELECT [FOR ..] |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAL9smLD1c6uXPNiMeOCoicqiLMzw3aufubMPD+WnCrm6VcdaSA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] INSERT .. ON CONFLICT DO SELECT [FOR ..] (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] INSERT .. ON CONFLICT DO SELECT [FOR ..]
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Michael Paquier
> wrote:
> > The patch does not currently apply. I am noticing as well that Peter
> > Geoghegan has registered himself as a reviewer a couple of hours back,
> > so moved to next CF with waiting on author as status.
>
> Marko unregistered me, so I promptly reregistered. You'll have to ask him
> why.
Oops. I didn't mean to do what I did, and I apologize. I had my months
mixed up and I thought this commit fest had ended without you having looked
at the patch, so I assumed you would register in the next CF if you were
still interested, or someone else could pick it up.
In any case, *I* don't have any interest in pursuing this patch at this
point. I think this is a really good feature, and as far as I know the
patch is technically solid, or at least was when it still applied. Can
someone else take it from here?
.m
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: