Re: Partial index "microvacuum"
От | Marko Tiikkaja |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Partial index "microvacuum" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAL9smLC=SxYiN7yZ4HDyk0RnZyXoP2vaHD-Vg1JskOEHyhMXug@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Partial index "microvacuum" (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
Ответы |
Re: Partial index "microvacuum"
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 7:25 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote: > What about v14? There were significant changes to the > microvacuum/index deletion stuff in that release: > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/14/btree-implementation.html#BTREE-DELETION Huh. Interesting. I'm sorry, I wasn't aware of this work and didn't have version 14 at hand. But it looks like both the partial index as well as the secondary index on (id::text) get cleaned up nicely there. I even tried a version where I have a snapshot open for the entire run, and the subsequents SELECTs clean the bloat up. I'll need to read up on the details a bit to understand exactly what changed, but it appears that at least this particular pattern has already been fixed. Thank you so much for your work on this! .m
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: