Re: [HACKERS] INSERT .. ON CONFLICT DO SELECT [FOR ..]
| От | Marko Tiikkaja |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] INSERT .. ON CONFLICT DO SELECT [FOR ..] |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAL9smLAu8X7DLWdJ7NB0BtcN=_kCz33Fz6WYUBDRysWdG0yFig@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] INSERT .. ON CONFLICT DO SELECT [FOR ..] (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] INSERT .. ON CONFLICT DO SELECT [FOR ..]
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 7:46 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 10:05 AM, Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to> wrote:
> But I'm generally against
> interfaces which put arbitrary restrictions on what power users can do on
> the basis that less experienced people might misuse the interface.
I agree with that as a broad principle, but disagree that it applies
here. Or if it does, then you have yet to convince me of it. In all
sincerity, if you think that I just don't understand your perspective,
then please try to make me understand it. Would a power user actually
miss ON CONFLICT DO SELECT? And if that's the case, would it really be
something they'd remember 5 minutes later?
I don't know, but I don't want to be limiting what people can do just because I can't come up with a use case.
In any case, others, feel free to chime in.
.m
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: