Re: [GENERAL] type "xxxxxxx" does not exist
От | Micky Hulse |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [GENERAL] type "xxxxxxx" does not exist |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKzdcNma6LXso-8--yONJMOYeeKhmmOjYVGycymabAzZMk_CJA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] type "xxxxxxx" does not exist (Paul Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] type "xxxxxxx" does not exist
Re: [GENERAL] type "xxxxxxx" does not exist |
Список | pgsql-general |
Hello and thanks for the help! On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Paul Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com> wrote: > It sounds like the type might be in a different schema. You can say \dn to > see the schemas in your database, and \dT+ will show the types along with > their schema. You could also do \dT+ foo.* to see all the types in schema > foo. Ahhhh, interesting! \dT+ myschema.* I see the type "xxx_xxx_xxxxx" (which is the one my method is looking for). There are not types in the public schema: # \dT+ public.* List of data types Schema | Name | Internal name | Size | Elements | Access privileges | Description --------+------+---------------+------+----------+-------------------+------------- (0 rows) > If you find that the type isn't in the public schema, try setting your > schema search path so that the function can locate it, e.g.: > SET search_path TO foo, public; Cool! Dumb question, but is foo the schema or the type? Thanks so much for the tips Paul! I really appreciate your help. :)
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: