Re: The case for version number inflation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Chris Travers
Тема Re: The case for version number inflation
Дата
Msg-id CAKt_Zfu0f-D0vZ1B9Ax8_wqmXd3sDRVx6X4TrjOi8zPU7bSX+w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: The case for version number inflation  (Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres@cybertec.at>)
Ответы Re: The case for version number inflation  (Chris Travers <chris.travers@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-advocacy


On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 12:30 AM, Hans-Jürgen Schönig <postgres@cybertec.at> wrote:

this is exactly the point. nobody will worry if he uses PostgreSQL 78 or PostgreSQL 79 - even if the change is significantly.
what was said about firefox is absolutely correct - personally i don't care at all and somebody should read the docs before deciding on fundamental infrastructure such as a database.
maybe i am too conservative but inflation has never solved a problem - not in real life and not in versioning.

To be honest I am more worried about worrying whether he is using Postgres 94, Postgres 95, or Postgres 96.

At least with the current numbering scheme that problem is well out of the way.

Best Wishes, 
Chris Travers

В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: The case for version number inflation
Следующее
От: Chris Travers
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: The case for version number inflation