Re: Procedural Languages
От | Chris Travers |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Procedural Languages |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKt_ZftXv-FNpvUbxJK9By7MHEzTis63CheM_0OM=7jpWejfyg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Procedural Languages (John Townsend <jtownsend@advancedformulas.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Procedural Languages
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Minor correction On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 1:57 PM, John Townsend <jtownsend@advancedformulas.com> wrote: > Fortran was the first computer language for me. (I guess that reveals my age > :-) ) Fortran was my second computer language, but I hated it. > > PL/pgSQL is easy to learn for me since it is pascal like. It appears this is > the one to use, if you want to write maintainable code for others. (Next > choice might be Perl*). > > PL/pgSQL was the choice by Postbooks. Almost 1300 functions (counting > triggers) are used for the open source addition. It's a good example of how > to do build a nice PG app. > > But I don't like the environment, namely using Qt and C++. Of course, if you > have this environment already setup, and you are a good C++ programmer, then > it will not be easy. > > *Perl was used in SMB Ledger. Minor correction: LedgerSMB uses Perl in the middle layer around the database. All our stored procedures are in SQL or PL/PGSQL depending on complexity of operations and inputs. Best Wishes, Chris Travers
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: