Re: Amazon High I/O instances
| От | Chris Travers |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Amazon High I/O instances |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKt_ZfsRMf9ZBVZ7fZXyhx8hd0kFCWXHnCr-uwZwHEMuWWrXjw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Amazon High I/O instances (Vincent Veyron <vv.lists@wanadoo.fr>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Amazon High I/O instances
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Vincent Veyron <vv.lists@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
Le mardi 21 août 2012 à 01:33 -0400, Sébastien Lorion a écrit :I wonder : is there a reason why you have to go through the complexity
>
>
> Since Amazon has added new high I/O instance types and EBS volumes,
> anyone has done some benchmark of PostgreSQL on them ?
>
of such a setup, rather than simply use bare metal and get good
performance with simplicity?
For instance, the dedibox I use for my app (visible in sig) costs 14,00
euros/month, and sits at .03% load average with 5 active users; you can
admin it like a home pc.
The main use cases I know of are relatively small instances where the web server and db server for an app may be on the same system.
--
Vincent Veyron
http://marica.fr/
Gestion informatique des sinistres d'assurances et des dossiers contentieux pour le service juridique
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: