Re: regression, deadlock in high frequency single-row UPDATE
От | hubert depesz lubaczewski |
---|---|
Тема | Re: regression, deadlock in high frequency single-row UPDATE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKrjmhdM=sRaQARMW62gSuZvGSJF20VX4UgQv4ZOoopxFoT-ZA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: regression, deadlock in high frequency single-row UPDATE (Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz>) |
Ответы |
Re: regression, deadlock in high frequency single-row UPDATE
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
For whatever it's worth, I was able to bisect the problem to this commit: commit 0ac5ad5134f2769ccbaefec73844f8504c4d6182 Author: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> Date: Wed Jan 23 12:04:59 2013 -0300 Improve concurrency of foreign key locking ... depesz On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 6:58 AM, Mark Kirkwood <mark.kirkwood@catalyst.net.nz > wrote: > On 09/12/14 12:55, Andrew Sackville-West wrote: > >> Some months later (stupid business priorities...) we have something to >> report on this. We have been able to produce a minimal schema to >> demonstrate the problem, and successfully induced the deadlock using >> pgbench (thanks to Paulo Tanimoto, cc-ed here). >> >> Please see: >> >> https://gist.github.com/andrewsw-janrain/40d1687db013b1e7c3b3 >> >> for detailed instructions on how to trigger the deadlock. >> >> I would be thrilled to learn that we've done something wrong here, >> otherwise I think this represents a regression introduced in 9.3. >> >> >> > > That is interesting - FWIW I can reproduce: > > - 9.2.9 no deadlock > - 9.4rc1 many deadlocks > > so something has changed after 9.2 for sure! > > Just mucking about I changed certain things in your schema setup (removed > ON DELETE CASCADE, use CURRENT_TIMESTAMP instead of now()...lessen the use > of DEFAULT)...however still seeing deadlocks in 9.4, so at least it is easy > to reproduce! > > Regards > > Mark > > > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs >
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: