Re: IDLE in transaction introspection

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Scott Mead
Тема Re: IDLE in transaction introspection
Дата
Msg-id CAKq0gvJdRwJXWo-F9uYP-qRc14aq5cB9Wn1HPGW2OpDF4Ys9_Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: IDLE in transaction introspection  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: IDLE in transaction introspection
Re: IDLE in transaction introspection
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> Maybe there's a better term than "running", like "in progress" or
>> something of that sort.
>
> "active"?

+1.

   Letting this one 'poll' a bit more before I post the patch, but here's what I have:
 
   If waiting == true, then state = WAITING
   else
     state = appropriate state

   I leave the waiting flag in place for posterity.  With this in mind, is the consensus:

   RUNNING

    or 

   ACTIVE

 --
  Scott Mead


--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: