Re: Let's get the OpenSCG packages listed on download
| От | Scott Mead |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Let's get the OpenSCG packages listed on download |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKq0gvJS-RRtC66RXVB695dkNT35Ea-jVnf_uZtrKaxv58i_LQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Let's get the OpenSCG packages listed on download (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Let's get the OpenSCG packages listed on download
Re: Let's get the OpenSCG packages listed on download |
| Список | pgsql-www |
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 3:04 AM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> On 25 Apr 2016, at 20:05, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
>
> -WWW,
>
> In reviewing:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAKq0gv+Gc0i8j=ktQSkMkLJmmTqUHAm=Eza7zLv+MdXCB6H+Bw@mail.gmail.com
>
> It becomes clear that they are following the Open Source way in a more transparent fashion that the other universal packages available.
In what way exactly? I can't even find the source code on the website. The existing installers are on git.postgresql.org.
Looks like an oversight, we're opening up the repo now.
The other thing to be very careful of is confusing users. Are these distributions interchangeable? What happens if a user tries to upgrade one with the other?
That's the beauty of our update manager, It's consistent across platforms and makes updates a snap. That being said, our testing includes using each set of binaries against data directories created with different installers.
--Scott
--
Sent via pgsql-www mailing list (pgsql-www@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: