Re: [pgsql-advocacy] What do we need for new PUGs?
От | Luca Ferrari |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] What do we need for new PUGs? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKoxK+6yfLmD1dD9O0H431rOOjNnGQ8y+Mn7csVPEz_1qP_JyQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: What do we need for new PUGs? (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] What do we need for new PUGs?
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 7:38 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Josh Berkus wrote: > >> So the question becomes: if what new PUGs need for infrastructure is not >> new mailing lists, then what do they need? > > Have "PUG" be a new type of organization in the website database. Users > (community accounts) can be marked admin of PUGs. > > Have "PUG events" be a new type of event in the website database. > Admins of PUGs can post new PUG events [, without requiring moderation.] > Being new objects, could we define a little what we are expecting from a PUG? > Show a box of the upcoming two or three PUG events somewhere in the front > page of www.postgresql.org (maybe "Local events this week"); also have a > link that opens a page listing all events in the next 30 days. Have a > way to list all events of any individual PUG. Maybe steal space from > "Latest News" for this. I like this idea. Luca
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: