Re: General 'big data' advice....
От | Luca Ferrari |
---|---|
Тема | Re: General 'big data' advice.... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKoxK+4CqcBYJiq=2E1PeLwwe6FC+_Hqai6NGYrB6kghpO5ZgA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | General 'big data' advice.... (James David Smith <james.david.smith@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-novice |
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 1:38 PM, James David Smith <james.david.smith@gmail.com> wrote: > 1) Is PostgreSQL going to be able to cope with this? In terms of the > table size? I think so... > Yes. > 2) My columns will be something like > person_id integer, > person_timestamp timestamp, > person_location_geom geometry > Any thoughts on those? The format of the columns? > I would think about partitioning data on person_id (ranges) or person_timestamp (ranges) so to have a few smaller tables than a huge table. > 3) I'll probably create a Primary Key which is a combination of > person_id and person_timestamp. Does this sound like a good idea? > Is the same person at different timestamps a different person for your logic? > 4) Should I use some indexes to improve performance maybe? It depends on which queries you are going to run, on which is organized your database (partitioning or not) and other details. Luca
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: