Re: replication connection and multi-command queries
От | Greg Rychlewski |
---|---|
Тема | Re: replication connection and multi-command queries |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKemG7WFJyv5crvXAJJYJOtAa-+odONeR0YaSa+szSk3f3XKww@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: replication connection and multi-command queries ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: replication connection and multi-command queries
|
Список | pgsql-novice |
On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 7:37 PM David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 5:28 PM David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 5:24 PM Greg Rychlewski <greg.rychlewski@gmail.com> wrote:Thanks for your reply. To give more context: I am contributing to a Postgres driver used by a programming language. We are currently trying to understand what is legal/not legal to be sent through this connection.In the documentation it states that the simple query protocol is followed on these connections, which is why we assumed a multi-command statement would work. I just wanted to make sure we are not doing anything wrong and that it is disallowed by design. We can, for instance, send "SELECT 1;" and receive a result.Please don't top-post. The convention on these lists is to inline post.If you are interacting at the protocol layer you probably should be posting to -hackers, not -novice.Or a -bug report. It would be good to show the code you are using to provoke the error. But I do see where we document the Simple Query Protocol and do not qualify it such that it doesn't take a multi-command message.David J.
Thank you. I will give those lists a shot. Apologies for the top-posting. I think I did it properly this time but gmail is a bit weird. Apologies if this is not inline either.
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: