Re: BUG #15844: MIPS: remove .set mips2 in s_lock.h to fix r6 build
От | YunQiang Su |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #15844: MIPS: remove .set mips2 in s_lock.h to fix r6 build |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKcpw6UTQbWBtHVCnVF_kySTH8iHiPO3ZaTE5+_2gUi1P7BS9A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #15844: MIPS: remove .set mips2 in s_lock.h to fix r6 build (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> 于2019年6月13日周四 下午10:07写道: > > PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes: > > MIPS r6 changes the encoding of LL/SC instruction, > > while the .set mips2 will force assembler to generate > > old encoding. > > This patch can fix this problem. > > So I have a bunch of questions about this patch. > > 1. What problem is this actually solving? We have what I think are > reasonably modern MIPS machines in the buildfarm (frogfish, > topminnow) and they aren't complaining. > Yes. The MIPS r6 is quite new, and the machine that you have should be pre-r6. > 2. What toolchains define __mips_isa_rev at all? Seems like we could > be trading one portability issue for another one. > It is defined by gcc/llvm. For gcc: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/41d6b10e96a1de98e90a7c0378437c3255814b16/gcc/config/mips/mips.h#L527 > 3. If we actually need something here, don't we need a run-time probe > rather than a compile-time check? Distro packagers, for example, > can't assume that their packages will be run on exactly the hardware > they build on. We don't think run-time probe is a good idea, since we treat r6 as a new architectures. It has it own port of OS, like Debian. Runtime probe make none sense here. > > regards, tom lane -- YunQiang Su
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: