Re: New sessions on a database to be dropped consume 100% cpu
От | Feike Steenbergen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New sessions on a database to be dropped consume 100% cpu |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAK_s-G3SP71oabtJ2F_Wt-WEUk6YwNF2W+VRO8KHk57bDwfJ1Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: New sessions on a database to be dropped consume 100% cpu (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: New sessions on a database to be dropped consume 100% cpu
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
> If you could install amcheck and see what it thinks about those indexes,
> that would be interesting.I created a backup (using pg_basebackup) from this cluster and had a look:
name_to_be_dropped=# select bt_index_check('pg_catalog.pg_depend_depender_index');
ERROR: cross page item order invariant violated for index "pg_depend_depender_index"
DETAIL: Last item on page tid=(255,138) page lsn=33A5/F47BC3B0.
> you could forcibly kill those processes and move on.
Unfortunately other databases are still serving a useful purpose on the same cluster
and it seems my only recourse would be restart the whole cluster, as I currently can't
kill them using SIGTERM.
and it seems my only recourse would be restart the whole cluster, as I currently can't
kill them using SIGTERM.
Thanks,
Feike
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: