Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
От | Mahendra Singh Thalor |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKYtNAqWHvcOoJsS+aLv2h2k_7G=171Z6MddQYLrUiM5Uob1KA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum (Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 at 12:48, Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 at 11:23, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 7:14 AM Masahiko Sawada > > <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > > > > > Thank you for updating the patch. Yeah MAXDEADTUPLES is better than > > > what I did in the previous version patch. > > > > > > > Would you like to resubmit your vacuumdb utility patch for this > > enhancement? I see some old version of it and it seems to me that you > > need to update that patch. > > > > + if (optarg != NULL) > > + { > > + parallel_workers = atoi(optarg); > > + if (parallel_workers <= 0) > > + { > > + pg_log_error("number of parallel workers must be at least 1"); > > + exit(1); > > + } > > + } > > > > This will no longer be true. > > Attached the updated version patch. > Thanks Sawada-san for the re-based patch. I reviewed and tested this patch. Patch looks good to me. -- Thanks and Regards Mahendra Singh Thalor EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: