Re: Extract numeric filed in JSONB more effectively
От | Andy Fan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Extract numeric filed in JSONB more effectively |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKU4AWqQ0hed=ZmpT+7Vxnp4H9ZxQqFz30=k=vvrmNe57X4dKQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Extract numeric filed in JSONB more effectively (jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
based on v13.
IMHO, it might be a good idea to write some comments on
jsonb_object_field_internal. especially the second boolean argument.
something like "some case, we just want return JsonbValue rather than
Jsonb. to return JsonbValue, make as_jsonb be false".
OK, I will proposal "return a JsonbValue when as_jsonb is false".
I am not sure "jsonb_object_field_start" is a good name, so far I only
come up with "jsonb_object_field_to_jsonbvalues".
Yes, I think it is a good idea. Puting the jsonbvalue in the name can
compensate for the imprecision of "internal" as a return type. I am thinking
if we should rename jsonb_finish_numeric to jsonbvalue_to_numeric as
well.
linitial(jsonb_start_func->args) =
makeRelabelType(linitial(jsonb_start_func->args),
INTERNALOID, 0,
InvalidOid,
COERCE_IMPLICIT_CAST);
if no need, output typmod (usually -1), so here should be -1 rather than 0?
I agree. -1 is better than 0.
Thanks for the code level review again! I want to wait for some longer time
to gather more feedback. I'm willing to name it better, but hope I didn't
rename it to A and rename it back shortly.
Best Regards
Andy Fan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: